English – Page 5

Executive summary

JEPI and JEPQ are two leading income-focused ETFs using covered call strategies, but they serve different investors. JEPI offers stable income with broad diversification and lower volatility, while JEPQ provides higher yield driven by tech exposure. Understanding their objectives, risks, and market behavior helps identify which ETF fits your strategy best.

JEPI

Investment objective

The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) is an income focused covered call ETF. It’s ideal for conservative investors who are seeking income and moderate growth. The manager of JEPI invests in a portfolio of stocks that combine 3 characteristics:

Part of the S&P 500, so in other word large cap stocks only;

Low volatility stocks, meaning, stocks that fluctuate far less than the market. This is generally the case of defensive stocks operating in stable industries. The main metric used by the fund manager of JEPI to assess volatility is the Beta. Beta is a coefficient risk, for instance a Beta of 0.5 would indicate that the stock exhibits 50% of the volatility of the stock market;

Value stocks: the analysts’ team of JEPI will conduct a fundamental bottom up approach to select only stocks that are considered undervalued.

Advantages

JEPI, an ETF focused on issuing call options, offers several advantages that might appeal to certain investors. Firstly, it boasts an attractive yield derived from the money earned through call option writing. Moreover, JEPI exhibits lower volatility compared to investing directly in an S&P 500 index ETF like SPY, making it a suitable option for conservative investors and income seekers.

Another positive aspect of JEPI is its ability to capitalize on high volatility, which often translates to increased premiums for the fund. Additionally, investors can save valuable time and effort by avoiding the need to personally write call options on the S&P 500, as JEPI handles this strategy on their behalf. Furthermore, with relatively low fees of 0.35% total expense ratio, JEPI presents a cost-effective investment choice. The ETF’s diversification across various sectors adds another layer of appeal, spreading risk across different industries.

However, JEPI does have some drawbacks that potential investors should consider. In bull markets, it is expected to underperform the S&P 500 index due to the call option writing strategy, which reduces volatility but also limits its performance during bullish periods.

Recap

Positives

Attractive yield thanks to money earned issuing call options;
Lower volatility than investing in a S&P500 index ETF such as SPY;
Suits conservative investors and income seekers;
High volatility usually increases the premiums earned by the fund;
Saves you time and effort (if you were yourself interested on writing call options on the S&P 500);
Relatively low fees (0.35% total expense ratio);
Diversification: JEPI is highly diversified across various sectors.

Negatives

In bull market, investors should expect a lower performance than the S&P 500 index. Issuing call options reduces volatility at the expense of higher performance in bull markets;

JEPQ

Investment objective

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is a high distribution yield ETF. It focuses on providing investors with a monthly income stream using covered call strategies. These strategies enhance yield by collecting premiums on call options. JEPQ invests in large cap Teck stocks that are part of the NASDAQ. Using a proprietary selection criteria, the manager would select companies with the highest prospects for growth seeking the highest adjusted return possible (low volatility combined with high returns).

Advantages

JEPQ ETF, focused on writing call options on the NASDAQ 100, offers similar benefits to JEPI. It provides an attractive yield from call option writing and boasts lower volatility compared to a NASDAQ 100 ETF like QQQ, appealing to conservative investors and income seekers.

However, JEPQ has some significant negatives that investors need to be aware of. It tends to perform poorly during bullish market conditions, as the covered call strategy curtails the upside potential of the NASDAQ 100.

Furthermore, JEPQ’s lack of diversification is a notable concern, with a heavy concentration in tech firms dominating the fund. This lack of diversification exposes investors to higher risks compared to a more balanced investment approach.

Recap

Positives

Attractive yield thanks to money earned issuing call options;

Lower volatility than investing in a NASDAQ 100 ETF such as QQQ;

Suits conservative investors and income seekers;

High volatility usually increases the premiums earned by the fund;

Saves you time and effort (if you were yourself interested on writing call options in the NASDAQ 100;

Relatively low fees (0.35% total expense ratio).

Negatives

Poor performance (compared to the index in bull markets). You are essentially giving up on the upside potentiel of the NASDAQ 100;

The strategy of covered calls becomes ineffective in an unpredictable market;

JEPQ is dominated by Tech firms so it’s far from being a diversified investment;

Yahoo finance as of December 10th

Conclusion

Ultimately, whether JEPI or JEPQ is a good investment depends on individual investor preferences, risk tolerance, and market outlook. JEPI’s lower volatility and diversification across sectors could be attractive to those seeking stability and income, while JEPQ’s focus on the NASDAQ 100 may appeal to tech-focused investors. It is crucial for investors to conduct thorough research, consider their financial goals, and consult with a financial advisor to make informed investment decisions.

Additional info (Video)

Home Blog — Islamic Finance Halal Stock Screener

Dividend investing is one of the most popular strategies in personal finance. The idea is simple: own shares in profitable companies, and those companies pay you a portion of their earnings on a regular basis — monthly, quarterly, or annually. You build wealth and generate income simultaneously.

For Muslim investors, the question is whether this strategy is compatible with Islamic finance principles. The answer, as with most things in halal investing, depends on the details.

The short answer: yes, dividend investing can be halal — but not all dividends are created equal. The permissibility depends on what company is paying the dividend, how that company earns its money, and whether the dividend itself represents a share of real business profits.

What Is a Dividend — And Why It Matters for Halal Investing

A dividend is a distribution of a company’s profits to its shareholders. When a company earns more money than it needs to reinvest in its business, it can return that surplus to the people who own shares.

From an Islamic finance perspective, this is fundamentally different from interest. Interest is a guaranteed, predetermined payment that has no connection to actual business performance. A dividend, by contrast, is a share of real profit — it goes up when the business does well, it can be cut or eliminated when the business struggles, and it reflects genuine economic activity.

This distinction — profit-sharing versus interest — is at the heart of why dividend investing can be permissible while bond investing is not.

Dividend vs Interest — The Core Distinction Dividend: Share of actual company profits. Variable. Tied to real business performance. → ✅ Principle is permissible Interest: Fixed, guaranteed payment regardless of business performance. → 🔴 Riba — not permissible The source of the payment matters. A dividend from a halal company is permissible. Interest from any source is not.

When Is a Dividend Halal?

A dividend is halal when all of the following conditions are met:

The company’s primary business is permissible — it does not derive its main revenue from alcohol, tobacco, gambling, conventional banking, weapons manufacturing, adult entertainment, or pork products
The company passes the financial screening tests — interest-bearing debt is below 33% of total assets, and prohibited revenue is below 5% of total revenue
The dividend represents a genuine share of business profits — not a disguised interest payment (as is sometimes the case with preferred shares)
If the company has minor prohibited revenue below the 5% threshold, the investor purifies the corresponding portion of the dividend by donating it to charity

If these conditions are met, collecting dividend income from that company is entirely permissible — and many scholars consider it one of the most clearly halal forms of investment income available.

When Is a Dividend NOT Halal?

There are several situations where a dividend, despite appearing to be a straightforward profit distribution, is not permissible.

Dividends from Haram Companies

The most obvious case: if the company paying the dividend operates primarily in a prohibited industry, the dividend is not halal regardless of how it is structured. A dividend from a conventional bank, a beer company, or a casino is not permissible — even though it is technically a share of profits.

The profits themselves were generated through haram means. You cannot purify the income by simply donating a portion of it. When the core business is impermissible, the entire investment is excluded.

Dividends from Conventional Preferred Shares

This is a gray area that many investors miss. Preferred shares look like dividend-paying investments, but most conventional preferred shares pay a fixed, predetermined dividend that functions essentially like interest. The payment does not vary with company performance. The rate is set in advance. This structure resembles riba more than genuine profit-sharing.

Most Islamic scholars classify conventional preferred shares as not permissible for this reason. The dividend label does not change the underlying economic reality.

Dividends from High-Debt Companies That Barely Pass the Threshold

A company with interest-bearing debt at 32% of total assets technically passes the AAOIFI screening threshold. But if that debt is a structural feature of the business model — rather than an incidental financing choice — some scholars recommend caution. In practice, use your screening app and verify annually.

The Best Halal Dividend Stocks for Canadian Investors

Some of the world’s strongest dividend-paying companies pass Sharia screening with relatively clean results. Here are categories and examples worth investigating (always verify with a current screening app before buying):

Company	Ticker	Sector	Sharia Status
Apple	AAPL	Technology	✅ Generally compliant — minor purification
Microsoft	MSFT	Technology	✅ Generally compliant — minor purification
Johnson & Johnson	JNJ	Healthcare	✅ Generally compliant — verify
Procter & Gamble	PG	Consumer Staples	✅ Generally compliant — verify
Shopify	SHOP.TO	Technology	✅ Generally compliant
CN Rail	CNR.TO	Industrials	⚠️ Generally compliant — monitor debt ratio
Royal Bank	RY.TO	Financials	🔴 Not halal — core business is banking
Enbridge	ENB.TO	Energy/Pipelines	⚠️ Check debt ratio — often near threshold

Notice that two of the most popular Canadian dividend stocks — Royal Bank and Enbridge — present problems. RBC is categorically excluded. Enbridge requires careful monitoring because pipeline companies often carry significant debt to finance their infrastructure.

Halal Dividend ETFs — The Easier Approach

Picking individual dividend stocks requires ongoing monitoring and annual re-verification. For most investors, a simpler approach is to use a halal dividend-focused ETF, which does the screening work for you.

While there are no ETFs in Canada specifically marketed as halal dividend ETFs, the major Sharia-compliant equity ETFs do pay dividends from their underlying holdings. WSHR.TO, SPUS, HLAL, and SPWO all distribute income from the dividends paid by their constituent companies.

The advantage of this approach is that you get immediate diversification across hundreds of halal-screened companies, you receive the aggregate dividend income automatically, and the fund manager handles the ongoing compliance monitoring.

Halal Dividend ETFs Available to Canadian Investors WSHR.TO — Wahed FTSE World Shariah ETF — global halal equity, pays quarterly distributions SPRE.TO — SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia ETF (CAD) — U.S. halal equity, distributions included SPUS — SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia ETF (USD) — publishes quarterly purification ratios HLAL — Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (USD) — U.S. halal equity with distributions SP Funds publishes purification ratios quarterly — making it easy to calculate your annual purification amount.

What About High-Yield Dividend Strategies?

Canadian investors love high-yield dividend strategies. Canadian banks, pipelines, telecoms, and REITs are the backbone of many income portfolios — and they yield 4-6% or more. Hamilton ETFs, Global X (formerly Horizons), and CI Financial have built entire product lines around high-yield Canadian dividends.

Unfortunately, most of these high-yield strategies fail Sharia screening. Canadian banks — the single largest source of high dividend yield in Canada — are categorically excluded. Many pipeline companies carry too much debt. Telecoms like Bell and Telus require case-by-case verification.

This is the honest trade-off of halal dividend investing: your yield will likely be lower than a conventional Canadian dividend portfolio. A halal dividend approach might generate 2.5-3.5% annually compared to the 4-6% that conventional Canadian dividend investors target.

But this is not as large a practical difference as it appears. The halal portfolio grows its underlying value over time through capital appreciation, while a high-yield conventional portfolio often sees less capital growth. Over a 20-year horizon, the total wealth difference tends to be much smaller than the yield gap suggests.

Purification — The Final Step

Even when investing in halal dividend stocks or ETFs, most companies will have some minor exposure to prohibited activities — a tech company earning bank interest on its cash holdings, for example. Scholars require investors to purify this portion by donating it to charity.

The calculation is straightforward. If Apple’s prohibited income ratio is 0.8% and you received $300 in Apple dividends, you donate $2.40. If SPUS has a 1.4% purification ratio and you received $500 in distributions, you donate $7.00. Most halal investors find the annual purification amount is well under $50, even on substantial portfolios.

Purification Quick Reference Step 1: Find purification ratio for each holding (Zoya app or fund website) Step 2: Multiply total dividends received × purification ratio Step 3: Donate the result to any recognized charity Example: $2,000 total dividends at an average 1.2% ratio = $24 to donate per year

Final Verdict

Is Dividend Investing Halal? — The Bottom Line Yes — dividend investing is permissible in Islam when done correctly. The key conditions: the company must pass sector screening (no haram industries), pass financial screening (debt below 33%, prohibited revenue below 5%), and any minor prohibited income must be purified through charitable donation. Preferred shares and conventional bank dividends are not permissible regardless of the dividend label. For most investors, the simplest approach is a halal ETF (WSHR.TO or SPUS) which handles the screening automatically and publishes purification ratios.

Want to check whether a specific dividend stock is halal? Use our Free Halal ETF & Stock Screener at halaletfhub.com/screener for an instant Sharia compliance analysis.

— Rachid Fouadi, M.Sc., CPA · halaletfhub.com

Investment Objective

Hamilton introduced a new ETF called UMAX, which focuses on the utilities sector (UMAX was launched June 14th 2023). This ETF is designed to provide investors with attractive monthly income while offering exposure to a diversified portfolio of utility services equity securities primarily listed in Canada and the U.S. UMAX aims to reduce volatility and enhance dividend income by employing an active covered call strategy. This post is also available in Video format.

Unlike some other income ETFs, UMAX does not utilize leverage. However, it still aims to generate higher monthly income for investors. It offers exposure to blue-chip Canadian utilities, including pipelines, telecoms, and railways. By implementing the covered call strategy, UMAX seeks to enhance monthly income and reduce volatility. Currently, the coverage through covered calls is approximately 50%.

UMAX targets a yield of 13% or more, with monthly distributions to provide consistent income.

Investors can access UMAX, along with other Hamilton ETFs, on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). These ETFs can be included in various portfolios, such as RRSP, RRIF, DPSP, RDSP, FHSA, RESP, and TFSA. Additionally, for investors interested in a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), they can contact their individual brokerage for setup details.

Similar funds from Hamilton ETFs

In addition to UMAX, Hamilton offers other notable ETFs in their lineup, including HMAX Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer and HYLD Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF.

HMAX is designed to maximize yield within the Canadian financials sector. It aims to provide investors with attractive monthly income by investing in a diversified portfolio of Canadian financial companies. On the other hand, HYLD focuses on the U.S. market and utilizes a similar covered call strategy to generate income and reduce volatility. It seeks to provide enhanced yield potential by investing in a diversified portfolio of U.S. securities, primarily in the large-cap segment.

Review HYLD: Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF

Review of HMAX: Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer

How UMAX is able to set such high dividend yield target?

According to the issuers’ website, UMAX is able to provide higher monthly income for two reasons:

UMAX writes covered call options on approximately 50% of the portfolio
The fund is currently writing option At The Money (ATM) wheras similar funds are writing options OTM (Out of The Money).

UMAX vs ZWU vs HUTE ETF

Strategy

UMAX: This ETF allocates 50% of its portfolio and uses at-the-money (ATM) options. It offers a dividend yield of approximately 13%* and does not employ leverage.

ZWU: Similar to UMAX, ZWU also allocates 50% of its portfolio, but it utilizes out-of-the-money (OTM) options. It has a dividend yield of approximately 8.6% and does not employ leverage.

HUTE: HUTE allocates 33% of its portfolio using OTM options and offers a dividend yield of 9.8%. It employs 25% leverage to amplify returns.

	% potfolio	Option strategy	Divdend Yield approx	Leverage
UMAX	50%	ATM	13%*	No
ZWU	50%	OTM	8.6%	No
HUTE	33%	OTM	9.8%	25%

Covered call strategy

ATM vs OTM Options

I invite you to consult the table below to understand the difference. As you can see, the UMAX fund has chosen to issue ATM call options because they are more profitable than OTM options. First, the premium is higher than that generated by an OTM strategy. However, the risk of loss is also higher.

The risk for an option always corresponds to the probability that the buyer will exercise it. If the strike price is higher than the current price (OTM), the chances of the option being exercised are low. However, the probability of the option being exercised is more plausible for an ATM option where the strike price is very close or equal to the stock’s current price.

Table

	Premium or option price	Risk	Reward
ITM (In the money call option) Stock price > Strike price	High	High	High
OTM (Out of the money call option) Stock price < Strike price	Cheap	Low	Low
ATM (At The Money call option) Stock price = Strike price	Medium	Medium	Medium

Typical expected result when writing a covered call option

Interest Rates and the Impact on Utilities and REITs

The performance of income-focused sectors like utilities and REITs is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Both sectors share similar characteristics: they generate stable, predictable cash flows and often distribute a large portion of earnings as dividends. When interest rates rise, however, the relative attractiveness of these yields declines, leading to downward pressure on prices.

The chart above illustrates this relationship clearly. It compares the Solactive Canada Utility Index (in blue) with the Bank of Canada 3-Month Treasury Bill rate (in orange) throughout 2024. As interest rates began to decline after peaking in mid-June, the utilities index rebounded sharply. This inverse correlation highlights a fundamental principle: when borrowing costs fall and bond yields decline, investors often rotate back into dividend-oriented sectors such as utilities and REITs, seeking higher income and potential capital gains.

Higher interest rates increase financing costs for these capital-intensive companies, reduce profitability, and compress valuations. Conversely, as rates ease, utilities and REITs benefit from cheaper debt refinancing and renewed investor appetite for stable income. This dynamic explains the recent recovery of the Solactive Canada Utility Index as expectations of rate cuts grew toward mid-2024.

For UMAX, which derives its yield from dividend-paying utilities combined with a covered call strategy, this environment is particularly supportive. Lower rates improve both price stability and option premiums, helping sustain its double-digit yield target. If the Bank of Canada continues its easing trajectory, utility stocks and REITs may continue to outperform, reinforcing UMAX’s potential as a powerful income generator for investors seeking diversification away from pure fixed income.

Video

Summary table Risk vs Benefits of a covered call strategy

Aspect	Description
Strategy	Selling call options on a security already owned in the portfolio
Name	Covered call strategy
Risk	Potential for limited upside if the stock price rises above the strike price
Benefit	Generates additional income through premium payments received from selling call options
Goal	To earn income from stock holdings while potentially reducing downside risk
Use	Often used by investors who are willing to sell their stock at a certain price if it reaches that level
Outcome	If the stock price stays below the strike price, the option expires worthless, and the investor keeps the premium payment. If the stock price rises above the strike price, the option buyer may exercise their right to buy the stock, and the investor must sell the stock at the strike price, but still keeps the premium payment.

UMAX Portfolio of stocks

TICKER	NAME	WEIGHT
BCE	BCE Inc	7.7%
TRP	TC Energy Corp	7.7%
ENB	Enbridge Inc	7.7%
RCI/B	Rogers Communications Inc	7.7%
FTS	Fortis Inc/Canada	7.7%
EMA	Emera Inc	7.7%
PPL	Pembina Pipeline Corp	7.7%
WCN	Waste Connections Inc	7.7%
CNR	Canadian National Railway Co	7.7%
H	Hydro One Ltd	7.7%
T	TELUS Corp	7.7%
NPI	Northland Power Inc	7.7%
CP	Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd	7.7%

Management fees

Management Fee

0.65%

UMAX Dividends

Sector Allocation

UMAX ETF provides a diversified portfolio with sector allocations designed to capture opportunities across different segments of the market. The fund’s sector allocation includes Communication Services (23.5%), Pipelines (23.1%), Industrials (23.9%), and Utilities (30.9%).

Communication Services focuses on telecommunications, media, and entertainment. Pipelines offer exposure to essential energy infrastructure. Industrials cover manufacturing, transportation, and construction. Utilities provide stability and income generation potential.

The UMAX ETF’s sector allocation aims to balance growth potential, income generation, and stability, offering investors a well-rounded investment approach. As with any investment, thorough research and consideration of personal circumstances are recommended. Consulting with a financial advisor is advised.

Final thought: is UMAX is the right ETF for you?

If you’re in pursuit of consistent dividend income, you’ve likely come across the UMAX ETF, which offers an alluring yield through its covered call strategy. This approach can indeed provide an attractive stream of income, but there are some key considerations to bear in mind.

Firstly, the high distribution offered by UMAX can be a double-edged sword. While it’s great for generating income, it may also increase your tax burden, so it’s wise to consult with a tax advisor to understand the implications for your specific situation.

Secondly, it’s important to understand that the covered call strategy comes with limitations. By design, it can cap the potential for growth. As highlighted in this post, roughly 50% of the UMAX portfolio is impacted by this strategy. The use of at-the-money (ATM) options is primarily aimed at boosting income, often at the expense of significant growth.

So, who is UMAX best suited for? This ETF is more aligned with investors who have a genuine need for a monthly income source and are willing to tolerate moderate volatility. If you can stomach the ups and downs and prioritize income over the potential for substantial long-term price appreciation, then UMAX may align with your financial goals.

However, it’s crucial to remember that no investment comes without trade-offs. The covered call strategy provides stability and income, but it may not deliver the same growth prospects as other investments. Your choice should depend on your unique financial circumstances, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.

In conclusion, UMAX can be a valuable tool for income-focused investors, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Consider your long-term goals, tax implications, and willingness to accept moderate volatility when deciding if this ETF is the right fit for your portfolio.

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is one of the most popular dividend ETFs in the world — loved for its high yield, strong dividend growth, and quality stock selection.
But for Canadian investors, buying SCHD directly isn’t always ideal due to currency conversion, U.S. withholding taxes, and account limitations (especially outside RRSPs).

So, what’s the best Canadian equivalent to SCHD?

Let’s break it down.

🏦 What Is SCHD?

Ticker: SCHD
Provider: Charles Schwab
MER: ~0.06%
Dividend yield: Around 3.5–4.0% (paid quarterly)
Holdings: 100 quality U.S. dividend stocks screened for consistency, profitability, and dividend sustainability.

Top holdings include:
PepsiCo, Verizon, Cisco, Home Depot, Pfizer, Coca-Cola, and Texas Instruments.

The ETF focuses on high-quality companies with 10+ years of dividend payments, low debt, and strong free cash flow. That’s why SCHD has built a reputation for being one of the most reliable dividend growth ETFs on the market.

🇨🇦 Why Canadians Look for an SCHD Equivalent

While SCHD trades on the NYSE, Canadian investors face two main challenges:

Currency exchange fees: Most Canadian brokers charge 1.5–2.0% to convert CAD to USD.
U.S. withholding tax: Dividends paid by U.S. ETFs are subject to a 15% tax — unless held inside an RRSP.

To avoid those costs, many Canadians prefer Canadian-listed ETFs that replicate SCHD’s style — high yield, strong dividend growth, and exposure to large-cap companies.

🧭 The Closest Canadian Equivalents to SCHD

ETF	Focus	MER	Yield (2025)	Key Features
VDY.TO	High-dividend Canadian equities	0.22%	~4.5%	Pure dividend focus; holds Canadian banks, telecoms, and pipelines.
XDV.TO	Canadian Dividend Index	0.30%	~4.7%	Follows Dow Jones Canada Select Dividend Index — similar “quality” approach to SCHD.
ZDV.TO	High Dividend Yield	0.39%	~5.0%	Broader mix of dividend payers; rebalanced semi-annually.
XDIV.TO	Low Volatility Dividend	0.10%	~4.3%	Focuses on stable, lower-volatility stocks with solid yields.
ZWC.TO	Covered Call Dividend	0.72%	~7.0% (monthly)	For higher income seekers — adds covered-call overlay.

⚖️ Which One Is Most Like SCHD?

There’s no perfect one-for-one match, but here’s how they stack up conceptually:

–VDY is closest in spirit — it holds high-quality, large-cap dividend growers (mainly banks, telecoms, and energy).

–XDV uses an index methodology that resembles SCHD’s focus on consistent dividend payers with strong fundamentals.

–XDIV is ideal for investors who want low volatility and similar income levels, though it’s 100% Canadian equities.

If you want a Canadian version of SCHD’s high-quality dividend focus, VDY and XDV are your best pure equity choices.

If you’re after monthly income and yield over growth, ZWC offers a higher cash flow alternative using a covered-call strategy — more like JEPI than SCHD, but still relevant for income investors.

🌎 What If You Want the Same U.S. Exposure?

If you specifically want exposure to U.S. dividend stocks (like SCHD) without buying SCHD directly, two good options are:

ETF	Provider	Description
ZDY.TO	BMO	U.S. Dividend ETF (CAD-hedged/unhedged versions). Holds U.S. dividend payers, paid in CAD.
VGG.TO	Vanguard Canada	U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index (CAD version of VIG). Focuses on companies growing dividends 10+ years.

These two ETFs hold U.S. dividend stocks, but trade in CAD on the TSX — a true middle ground between SCHD and domestic dividend ETFs.

💰 Tax Tip: Hold SCHD in an RRSP, Not TFSA

If you decide to buy SCHD directly on the NYSE, it’s best held in an RRSP.
That’s the only Canadian account type exempt from the 15% U.S. withholding tax on dividends under the Canada–U.S. tax treaty.

In a TFSA or non-registered account, you’ll lose 15% of the dividend income automatically — even before you file taxes.

🧩 Final Thoughts: Building “Your Own SCHD” in Canada

Here’s a simple way to mimic SCHD’s style with Canadian ETFs:

Component	ETF	Allocation	Purpose
U.S. Dividend Exposure	ZDY or VGG	50%	U.S. large-cap dividend stocks (CAD-denominated)
Canadian Dividend Core	VDY or XDV	40%	Blue-chip Canadian income
Monthly Income Booster	ZWC	10%	Covered-call overlay for extra cash flow

This mix gives you a diversified, high-yield portfolio across both U.S. and Canadian dividend payers — the closest possible Canadian version of SCHD, while keeping simplicity and tax efficiency.

📊 Key Takeaways

SCHD = high-quality, large-cap U.S. dividend ETF.

VDY, XDV, XDIV = best Canadian-listed substitutes.

ZDY or VGG = Canadian-listed ETFs that hold U.S. dividend stocks (true equivalents).

ZWC = higher monthly income option if you prefer cash flow over growth.

For direct SCHD exposure, hold it in an RRSP only to avoid U.S. withholding tax.

💬 Bottom Line

If you love SCHD’s strategy but invest primarily in CAD,
👉 VDY or XDV are your best Canadian equivalents.
For a cross-border twist, ZDY or VGG give you SCHD-style exposure without leaving the TSX.

You’ll earn strong dividends, reduce currency hassle, and keep your portfolio simple — exactly what long-term investors want.

The goal: U.S. real estate exposure, Canadian simplicity

Many Canadian investors want to add real estate exposure to their portfolio without buying property directly.
In the U.S., one of the most popular choices is VNQ — the Vanguard Real Estate ETF.
It offers simple, diversified exposure to U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — companies that own and operate income-producing properties like office buildings, warehouses, apartment complexes, and shopping centers.

With a yield near 3.7% and holdings in over 150 major U.S. REITs, VNQ has become a go-to ETF for long-term income and diversification.

But for Canadians, buying VNQ directly comes with complications:

It’s listed in USD, meaning conversion fees.
It’s subject to U.S. withholding tax on dividends (except in RRSPs).
It’s foreign property for tax reporting if you hold over $100,000 CAD in U.S. assets.

That’s why investors often search for a “VNQ Canadian equivalent” — something listed on the TSX, traded in Canadian dollars, and providing similar exposure.

🔍 Understanding what “equivalent” really means

When Canadians say “VNQ equivalent,” they’re usually looking for:

Goal	What It Means
Exposure	U.S. REITs (not Canadian REITs)
Currency	Canadian dollars preferred
Listing	ETF traded on the TSX
Tax	Canadian tax-reporting simplicity
Yield	Regular income distributions

Unfortunately, there’s no Canadian-listed ETF that perfectly replicates VNQ’s portfolio of U.S. REITs.
Instead, investors have a few practical options depending on their priorities.

🏢 Option 1 – Buy VNQ directly (U.S.-listed)

Ticker: VNQ (NYSE)

MER: 0.12%

Currency: USD

Yield: ~3.7%

Exposure: 100% U.S. REITs

Best account: RRSP (to avoid 15% withholding tax on dividends)

✅ Pros

Direct exposure to the full U.S. REIT market
Lowest fees and highest liquidity
Easy to understand and globally diversified within U.S. property types

⚠️ Cons

Must convert CAD to USD
Withholding tax applies in TFSA or non-registered accounts
FX fluctuations affect returns

💡 Tip: Holding VNQ inside an RRSP is often the most efficient approach — no U.S. tax drag and full exposure to American real estate.

🏦 Option 2 – Canadian REIT ETFs (not true equivalents but still real estate exposure)

If you prefer to stay fully in Canadian dollars, you can buy ETFs that hold Canadian REITs.
These funds don’t track U.S. real estate, but they offer monthly income and exposure to Canada’s property market — often with higher yields.

ETF	Name	Focus	MER	Yield (approx.)	Key Holdings
ZRE.TO	BMO Equal Weight REIT Index ETF	🇨🇦 Canadian REITs	0.55%	~5.2%	RioCan, SmartCentres, Granite
VRE.TO	Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT ETF	🇨🇦 Canadian REITs	0.38%	~4.8%	Allied, RioCan, Granite
XRE.TO	iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT ETF	🇨🇦 Canadian REITs	0.61%	~4.9%	CAR.UN, SmartCentres, RioCan

✅ Pros

Traded in CAD, no currency risk
Higher yields than VNQ
Suitable for TFSA, RRSP, or non-registered accounts

⚠️ Cons

Canadian REIT market is small (~20 stocks total)
Less diversified than VNQ
More concentrated in retail and residential properties

These ETFs are excellent for income stability, but remember: they track Canadian real estate, not the U.S. market.

💵 Option 3 – U.S. REIT mutual funds offered in Canada

If your goal is U.S. real estate exposure without trading in USD, some Canadian mutual funds invest directly in U.S. REITs.
Examples include:

Fund	Provider	MER	Description
RBC U.S. REIT Fund (Series F)	RBC Global Asset Management	~1.4%	Diversified portfolio of top U.S. REITs
Fidelity U.S. REIT Fund (Series F)	Fidelity Investments Canada	~1.5%	Similar exposure to VNQ in CAD
TD U.S. Real Estate Fund	TD Asset Management	~1.9%	Active management of U.S. REITs

✅ Pros

Held in CAD (no FX conversion)
Provides true U.S. REIT exposure
Available through most Canadian brokerages

⚠️ Cons

Much higher fees (MERs over 1%)
May underperform passive ETFs like VNQ

These are often used in managed portfolios or by investors who want simplicity and don’t mind paying for it.

🌍 Option 4 – Global or U.S. total-market ETFs that include some REIT exposure

If you already hold a diversified U.S. total-market ETF such as VUN.TO or XUU.TO, you already own a small slice of U.S. REITs (about 2–3% of the index).
However, this exposure is minimal and won’t replicate VNQ’s performance.

These ETFs are great for general diversification but not for targeted real-estate exposure.

⚖️ Choosing what’s best for you

Investor Type	Best Choice	Why
Want true U.S. REIT exposure	Buy VNQ (USD)	Exact same holdings as U.S. investors, low cost
Prefer to stay in CAD	ZRE.TO or VRE.TO	Canadian REIT exposure, high yield, no currency risk
Want U.S. REITs in CAD without converting currency	RBC or Fidelity U.S. REIT Funds	Mutual funds provide the correct exposure
Already hold total-market ETFs	No change needed	You already have minor REIT exposure

🧩 The bottom line

As of 2025, there is no ETF listed on the TSX that perfectly replicates VNQ’s exposure to U.S. REITs in Canadian dollars.

However, you still have excellent options:

Buy VNQ directly if you’re comfortable using USD (best inside RRSP).
Choose Canadian REIT ETFs like ZRE.TO or VRE.TO for local property exposure and higher yields.
Consider U.S. REIT mutual funds if you want VNQ-like exposure but prefer to stay in CAD.

Each approach has trade-offs in currency risk, taxes, and cost — but all can help you achieve the same goal: adding the stability and income of real estate to your investment portfolio.

Canadian investors love the stability and dividends of our big banks. For those seeking monthly income and steady returns, bank ETFs are among the most reliable income-generating options on the market. In this post, we’ll compare some of the best Canadian bank ETFs designed for income investors, focusing on those that pay monthly distributions.

🏦 Why Bank ETFs Are Popular in Canada

Canada’s financial sector is dominated by a handful of strong, well-capitalized institutions — the “Big Six”: RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, and National Bank.
These banks have a history of paying consistent dividends, even during economic downturns.

Bank ETFs allow investors to:

Get instant diversification across major Canadian banks.
Earn attractive monthly income.
Enjoy professional management and liquidity without picking individual stocks.

💵 Top Monthly-Paying Bank ETFs in Canada

Below are the top-performing and most popular ETFs for Canadian income investors who want consistent monthly distributions.

🟩 1. Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Financials ETF (HMAX)

Dividend Yield: ~12.8% (monthly)
AUM: $1.7B+
MER: ~0.92%
Leverage: No leverage
Provider: Hamilton ETFs

Overview:

HMAX (Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF) is among the highest-yielding financial-sector ETFs in Canada, paying roughly 12–13% annually in monthly distributions.

It invests primarily in Canada’s Big Six banks — RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, and National Bank — along with major insurance companies such as Manulife, Sun Life, and Intact Financial. These firms anchor Canada’s economy and are known for their resilience and steady dividend histories.

Where HMAX stands apart is its aggressive covered call strategy. The fund writes at-the-money (ATM) call options on a portion of its holdings — meaning the strike prices are close to the current market price. This generates maximum option premium income, which significantly boosts its yield.

However, this also means less participation in market upside since many holdings may be called away during strong rallies. In other words, HMAX prioritizes income stability over capital appreciation, making it ideal for income-seeking investors, retirees, or those who want to enhance cash flow in a low-interest-rate or sideways market environment.

Importantly, HMAX is not leveraged, and all holdings are in Canadian dollars, reducing currency risk for domestic investors. It’s an excellent option for those who value predictable monthly income from Canada’s strongest financial institutions.

Summary:

Strategy: Covered calls (At-the-Money)
Focus: Maximum income generation
Yield: ~12–13%
Ideal for: Income investors prioritizing cash flow over growth

Pros:
✅ Extremely high monthly yield
✅ Broad exposure to banks and insurers
✅ Great for income-focused portfolios

Cons:
⚠️ Limited upside potential due to covered call strategy
⚠️ Not ideal for pure growth investors

🟦 2. BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)

Dividend Yield: ~5.7% (monthly)
AUM: $3.5B+
MER: ~0.83%
Leverage: Non-leveraged
Provider: BMO Global Asset Management

ZWB (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) is one of Canada’s most trusted income ETFs, offering exposure to the Big Six Canadian banks through a more conservative covered call strategy than HMAX.

ZWB’s portfolio includes RBC, TD, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC, and National Bank, and it’s built to provide consistent monthly income while preserving a portion of the upside potential in rising markets.

Unlike HMAX, ZWB writes out-of-the-money (OTM) call options. This means the strike prices are slightly above the current share price, allowing the ETF to collect option premiums while still retaining some upside participation if bank stocks rise. As a result, ZWB’s yield (around 5–6%) is lower than HMAX, but investors benefit from better capital appreciation potential over time.

This OTM approach makes ZWB an excellent fit for balanced or conservative investors who want monthly income without fully sacrificing growth. In addition, ZWB’s distributions are often tax-efficient, consisting largely of eligible Canadian dividends and option premiums, which are taxed more favourably than interest income in non-registered accounts.

Managed by BMO Global Asset Management and backed by over $3.5B in AUM, ZWB offers liquidity, stability, and simplicity — a go-to ETF for long-term Canadian income portfolios.

Summary:

Strategy: Covered calls (Out-of-the-Money)
Focus: Balance between income and upside growth
Yield: ~5–6%
Ideal for: Conservative investors or retirees seeking steady income with growth potential

Pros:
✅ Reliable monthly distributions
✅ One of Canada’s largest and most established covered call ETFs
✅ Simple, low-risk exposure to the Big Six banks

Cons:
⚠️ Slightly higher MER
⚠️ Limited capital appreciation compared to plain index ETFs like ZEB

🟨 3. iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN)

Dividend Yield: ~2.6% (monthly)
AUM: $1.8B+
MER: 0.60%
Leverage: Non-leveraged
Provider: iShares (BlackRock Canada)

XFN (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) is a broad, low-cost exposure to Canada’s financial sector, offering investors a pure-play, growth-oriented approach to the country’s banks, insurers, and asset managers. Unlike covered call ETFs such as ZWB or HMAX, XFN does not use options strategies — it’s a straightforward index-tracking ETF, designed to mirror the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index.

The ETF’s holdings include Canada’s Big Six banks (RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, National Bank), along with major insurance and financial services companies like Manulife, Sun Life, Intact Financial, and Brookfield Asset Management. This blend provides exposure to both banking profitability and insurance stability, giving investors well-rounded coverage of the financial industry.

With a dividend yield of about 2.5–2.7% paid monthly, XFN’s income stream is modest compared to covered call ETFs, but it offers stronger long-term growth potential. Because it doesn’t sell call options, XFN retains full exposure to capital gains during bull markets — making it more suitable for growth-oriented or total-return investors who want to participate fully in rising bank stocks.

From a cost perspective, XFN has a management expense ratio (MER) of 0.60%, which is reasonable given its large-cap exposure and liquidity. Its distributions are composed mainly of eligible Canadian dividends, making it tax-efficient for investors in non-registered accounts.

In summary, XFN is a solid, low-maintenance choice for investors who believe in the long-term strength of Canadian financials and prefer to capture both dividends and price growth without the trade-offs of a covered call strategy.

Summary:

Strategy: Passive index tracking (no covered calls)
Focus: Growth and dividend income from Canada’s largest financial firms
Yield: ~2.6% (monthly)
MER: 0.60%
Ideal for: Long-term investors seeking growth + moderate income

Pros:
✅ Diversified financial exposure
✅ Better total return potential
✅ Monthly dividends with low volatility

Cons:
⚠️ Lower yield than covered call ETFs
⚠️ Smaller income stream for pure income seekers

🟧 4. Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL)

Dividend Yield: ~4.7% (monthly)
AUM: ~$690M
MER: ~2.09%
Leverage: 1.25x leveraged
Provider: Hamilton ETFs

HCAL (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF) offers investors a unique way to boost income and returns from Canada’s most stable sector — the Big Six banks. Managed by Hamilton ETFs, HCAL uses a modest leverage strategy (approximately 1.25x) to enhance both yield and total return potential, while still maintaining a monthly distribution.

The ETF holds a concentrated portfolio of Canadian bank stocks, including RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, and National Bank. These institutions are known for their profitability, global diversification, and strong dividend track records — making them a cornerstone of most Canadian portfolios.

By applying 1.25x leverage, HCAL increases its exposure to the underlying bank stocks by 25%. This means that if Canadian banks perform well, HCAL’s total return and income can outperform non-leveraged bank ETFs like ZEB or ZWB. However, leverage also works both ways — in market downturns, losses are magnified compared to traditional ETFs.

HCAL does not use covered calls, so it retains full participation in market upside. Instead, it focuses on capital growth and dividend income, which it distributes to investors monthly. The fund’s MER is higher (~2.09%) due to the cost of leverage, but many investors find this acceptable given the enhanced yield (around 4.5–5%) and strong long-term potential when Canadian banks recover or interest rates stabilize.

From a portfolio-construction standpoint, HCAL fits best as a core satellite position for investors who already own conservative ETFs or GICs and want to boost returns without going into high-yield or covered call products.

Summary:

Strategy: Modest leverage (1.25x) on Canadian bank stocks
Focus: Enhanced income and growth (no covered calls)
Yield: ~4.5–5% (monthly)
MER: ~2.09%
Ideal for: Long-term investors comfortable with moderate risk and seeking higher total returns

Pros:
✅ Higher income potential
✅ Focused on Canada’s most stable sector
✅ Strong historical performance when rates stabilize

Cons:
⚠️ Leverage increases volatility
⚠️ More sensitive to interest rate changes

🧠 Final Thoughts: Which Is Best for You?

ETF	Yield	Growth Potential	Risk Level	Ideal For
HMAX	🔥 Very High (~12–13%)	⚡ Partial	Moderate	Income-focused investors seeking high yield with some upside exposure
ZWB	💰 Moderate (~5–6%)	✅ Balanced	Low–Moderate	Investors looking for a balanced approach between steady income and market growth
XFN	💵 Lower (~2.6%)	🚀 Full	Low	Growth-oriented investors focused on long-term capital appreciation
HCAL	⚡ Medium (~4.5–5%)	🚀 Strong	Moderate–High	Investors seeking enhanced total returns through moderate leverage

📊 Key Takeaway

If your goal is to generate steady monthly income, covered call ETFs like ZWB and HMAX offer a powerful mix of yield and stability.
If you can handle more volatility, HCAL can boost returns — but always remember that higher yield = higher risk.

Diversifying across 2–3 of these ETFs can balance income, risk, and growth, making them ideal tools for Canadian income investors in 2025.

Both Vanguard’s VGRO and iShares’ XGRO are “one-fund” ETFs built for growth-focused Canadian investors.
They each hold ~80% stocks and 20% bonds, offering global diversification, automatic rebalancing, and simplicity.

But which performs better? Let’s look side-by-side.

🧩 Quick Overview

Feature	VGRO (Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio)	XGRO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio)
Ticker	VGRO	XGRO
Provider	Vanguard Canada	BlackRock Canada
MER (2025)	~0.25%	~0.20%
Management Fee	0.22%	0.18%
AUM (2025)	$3.7B+	$3.2B+
Target Allocation	80% equities / 20% bonds	80% equities / 20% bonds
Rebalancing	Automatic	Automatic
Currency Hedging	Unhedged	Unhedged

🔹 Verdict: Both are low-cost and diversified.
XGRO edges out slightly on fees, while VGRO is preferred by investors loyal to Vanguard’s structure.

Both VGRO and XGRO are cost-effective, diversified growth ETFs designed for long-term Canadian investors. VGRO, managed by Vanguard Canada, charges a slightly higher MER of 0.25% versus XGRO’s 0.20% under BlackRock. Each maintains an 80% equity and 20% bond target, automatically rebalanced and unhedged for currency exposure. VGRO has the edge in brand trust and simplicity, while XGRO is marginally cheaper, appealing to fee-conscious investors. In essence, both funds deliver reliable diversification and ease of use; VGRO suits investors who prefer Vanguard’s structure, while XGRO offers nearly identical exposure at a slightly lower cost.

🌍 Geographic Exposure (2025)

Region / Country	VGRO	XGRO
United States	45.1%	39.8%
Canada	30.9%	34.4%
Japan	4.1%	4.8%
United Kingdom	2.4%	2.9%
China	2.4%	1.3%
France	1.5%	2.0%
Germany	1.5%	1.8%
Other Countries	10.1%	9.1%

🔹 VGRO = higher U.S. exposure, more focus on North America
🔹 XGRO = slightly broader international diversification

💼 Top Holdings (Underlying ETFs)

Allocation	VGRO	XGRO
U.S. Equity	Vanguard U.S. Total Market ETF – 36.8%	iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock ETF (ITOT) – 36.3%
Canadian Equity	Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap – 25.2%	iShares S&P/TSX Capped Composite (XIC) – 20.5%
International Developed	FTSE Developed ex North America – 14.0%	iShares MSCI EAFE IMI (XEF) – 19.7%
Emerging Markets	Vanguard FTSE EM All Cap – 5.7%	iShares MSCI EM (XEC) – 4.3%
Canadian Bonds	Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond – 10.9%	iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond (XBB) – 12.5%
U.S. & Global Bonds (Hedged)	7.3% combined	6.7% combined

🔹 VGRO: More Canada + U.S.
🔹 XGRO: More developed markets outside North America

VGRO and XGRO share a similar growth-oriented 80/20 structure but differ in regional focus. VGRO leans more toward North America, with heavier U.S. (36.8%) and Canadian (25.2%) exposure, appealing to investors seeking dividend-friendly Canadian content and U.S. market dominance. XGRO, meanwhile, allocates more to international developed markets (19.7%) through Europe and Asia, offering broader global diversification. On the fixed-income side, XGRO holds slightly more bonds (12.5% vs. 10.9%), providing marginally lower volatility. In short, VGRO favors home bias and growth from North America, while XGRO emphasizes diversification and slightly lower overall portfolio risk.

📈 Performance (as of September 2025)

Symbole	1 an	3 ans	5 ans	10 ans
XGRO.TO	18.53%	19.06%	11.90%	9.87%
VGRO.TO	18.41%	18.60%	11.72%	—

🔹 Performance is virtually identical. Source: Yahoo finance
Long-term results will depend more on market conditions than fund choice.

⚖️ Pros and Cons

	VGRO	XGRO
✅ Pros	– Higher U.S. weighting – More Canadian exposure (dividend tax benefit) – Simple Vanguard structure	– Lower MER – Broader global diversification – Slightly less volatile
⚠️ Cons	– Slightly higher cost – Less international exposure	– Slightly less U.S. weighting – Lower Canadian dividend weight

VGRO and XGRO share a similar growth allocation but appeal to slightly different investor preferences. VGRO offers higher U.S. and Canadian exposure, making it attractive to investors who value familiarity, dividend tax advantages, and Vanguard’s straightforward fund structure. However, this comes at the cost of a slightly higher MER and less international diversification. XGRO, on the other hand, stands out with a lower fee, broader global reach, and marginally lower volatility — ideal for investors seeking wider exposure beyond North America. In essence, VGRO favors home-country comfort and simplicity, while XGRO prioritizes cost efficiency and global diversification.

🧠 Which ETF Should You Pick?

Investor Type	Best Choice
Prefer more U.S. & Canadian exposure	VGRO
Prefer broader international diversification	XGRO
Fee-sensitive long-term investor	XGRO
Dividend-oriented Canadian investor	VGRO
Loyal to Vanguard philosophy	VGRO
Already using iShares Core ETFs	XGRO

💡 Bottom Line

Both VGRO and XGRO deliver what most investors need:
✅ Diversification
✅ Simplicity
✅ Low cost
✅ Long-term growth

They’re near-identical in structure and performance — your decision should hinge on fees, regional preference, and brand loyalty.

For most Canadians:

Choose VGRO if you want more North American exposure.

Choose XGRO if you prefer lower fees and slightly more global reach.

Either way, you’re investing smart — and staying the course matters far more than which ticker you choose.

Executive summary VDY vs XEI

When contemplating between VDY and XEI, the decision hinges on your investment goals. VDY emphasizes dividend yield, drawing from high-quality Canadian stocks, though it faced challenges due to a banking sector retreat. On the other hand, XEI, with a passive strategy, showcases resilience through the strength of the energy sector. Consider your risk tolerance and investment objectives—consistent growth or robust dividends. While VDY leans towards the latter, be mindful of its heavy exposure to the financial sector. In contrast, XEI offers a more stable trajectory. Weigh the nuances outlined to align your investment strategy with your financial objectives.

VDY:

VDY is a popular Canadian dividend ETF, offering instant exposure to a high-quality portfolio of high dividend-paying stocks. This Canadian-focused ETF aims to replicate the performance of the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, which comprises Canadian stocks with a high dividend yield. Managed by FTSE, a global leader in index creation, the index follows a meticulous process. It selects companies from the broad Canadian equity index (FTSE Canada Index) and evaluates their 12-month forward dividend yield using Thomson Reuters’ I/B/E/S. Stocks forecasted to pay no regular dividends in the next 12 months are excluded. The index then ranks and periodically screens for liquidity. In examining VDY’s objective, strategy, volatility, and performance, this post also delves into a comparison with rival ETFs, providing investors with a comprehensive overview of VDY stock in the Canadian dividend landscape.

XEI:

XEI ETF, managed with a passive strategy, aims to replicate the performance of the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF. Ideal for investors seeking long-term capital growth, XEI provides exposure to diversified sectors of Canadian companies. The ETF offers a monthly dividend income, catering to investors desiring frequent payouts. The S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index, comprised of 50 to 75 stocks, focuses on dividend income, with constituent issuer weights limited to 5% and sector weights capped at 30%. Managed by Standard & Poor’s, the index considers criteria like market capitalization, liquidity, and domicile on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Rebalanced quarterly, it ensures alignment with its objectives and provides geographic and economic balance across 11 GICS® sectors.

Performance comparison VDY vs XEI

VDY vs XEI: Full comparison

Objective and Strategy:

VDY, focusing on high-quality Canadian dividend stocks, replicates the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index using a meticulous selection process. Meanwhile, XEI adopts a passive strategy, tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF to provide exposure to diversified sectors of Canadian companies. Both ETFs aim to meet investors’ objectives, with VDY emphasizing high dividend yield and XEI targeting long-term capital growth.

Volatility and Performance:

VDY’s approach involves evaluating 12-month forward dividend yield, excluding stocks forecasted to pay no dividends. XEI, on the other hand, follows criteria such as market capitalization, liquidity, and domicile to ensure alignment with its objectives. Both strategies contribute to overall performance, with VDY emphasizing quality and dividend yield, while XEI offers exposure to a broad market with a focus on high dividends.

VDY.TO, despite its historical strong performance, faced headwinds at the start of the year due to a retreat in the big Canadian banking sector. The negative impact on VDY’s YTD return of -4.56% can be attributed to the significant influence of banking stocks in its portfolio. The retreat is likely associated with the rise in interest rates, a factor that tends to impact banking stocks negatively.

On the other hand, XEI.TO has displayed better performance YTD, with a positive return of 0.21%, mainly attributed to the resilience of the energy sector. The positive performance of the energy sector has acted as a buffer, mitigating the overall impact of sector-specific challenges faced by VDY.

Fees:

In terms of fees, both ETFs are tied, with an identical Management Expense Ratio (MER) of 0.22%. Vanguard, managing VDY, has a reputation for prioritizing investors and has a track record of lowering fees on their ETF lineup.

High Dividend ETF Duel: Analyzing HMAX vs BKCL

Best High-Interest Savings Account ETFs In Canada

10 Best Covered Call ETF Canada – Boost you income!

Size:

A crucial factor in ETFs is their size, influencing liquidity and trading dynamics. Both XEI and VDY have similar Assets Under Management (AUM) of approximately $1.76 billion and $1.77 billion, respectively, indicating sufficient size for buy-and-hold investors.

Holdings:

XEI tracks the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index with 75 stocks, primarily concentrated in energy, financials, telecommunications, and utilities. VDY tracks the FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index with 39 stocks, concentrated in financials, energy, telecommunications, and utilities. The distribution yields for XEI and VDY are close.

Conclusion

Personally, I lean towards VDY due to its emphasis on high-quality dividend stocks. However, I am mindful of its heavy exposure to the financial sector during portfolio allocation. This awareness allows for a balanced approach, considering both the strengths and potential challenges associated with VDY’s specific sector concentration.

The choice between VDY and XEI depends on investors’ preferences and objectives. VDY’s emphasis on dividend yield may appeal to income-focused investors, while XEI’s broad exposure and resilience in specific sectors may attract those seeking long-term growth.

Portfolio holdings

VDY ETF holdings

Holding Name	% of Market Value
Royal Bank of Canada	13.86%
Toronto-Dominion Bank	12.62%
Enbridge Inc.	7.46%
Bank of Nova Scotia	7.45%
Bank of Montreal	6.63%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	4.80%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.	4.67%
TC Energy Corp.	4.51%

Please refer to issuers’ website for the most up-to-date data

XEI ETF holdings

Name	Weight (%)
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LTD	5.72
NUTRIEN LTD	5.39
TC ENERGY CORP	5.12
ENBRIDGE INC	5.03
TORONTO DOMINION	5.02
SUNCOR ENERGY INC	4.85
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA	4.83
BCE INC	4.62
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA	4.43
TELUS CORP	4.18

please consult issuers’s website for up-to-date data

Investment objective

The Global X Nasdaq-100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is one of the most popular income-oriented exchange-traded funds in the U.S. With a double-digit yield and the promise of monthly income, it attracts investors looking for consistent cash flow. But behind the headline yield, there are trade-offs that every investor should understand before buying.

This article provides a comprehensive review of QYLD, including how it works, its advantages, drawbacks, performance history, and whether it deserves a place in your portfolio. This post is available in Video format!

What Is QYLD?

QYLD was launched by Global X Funds in 2013. The fund is designed to provide high current income by using a covered call strategy on the Nasdaq-100 Index.

Here’s how it works:

QYLD buys all the stocks in the Nasdaq-100 (the same holdings as QQQ).

The fund then sells (“writes”) at-the-money call options on the Nasdaq-100 index.

The premiums collected from selling these options are distributed to shareholders as monthly dividends.

This strategy is often called a “buy-write” approach: you buy the index and simultaneously write calls against it.

Is QYLD a good investment?

Let’s break down the main benefits of holding QYLD:

Positives

Attractive Yield: QYLD consistently pays out yields in the 12–13% range, significantly higher than traditional dividend ETFs.

Monthly Income: Unlike many ETFs that pay quarterly, QYLD distributes income monthly — making it easier to plan cash flow for expenses.

Lower Volatility vs. QQQ: While it won’t fully protect against losses, the option premiums provide some cushion in choppy or declining markets.

Liquidity: With more than $6 billion in assets under management, QYLD trades with tight bid-ask spreads, making it accessible for retail and institutional investors alike.

Ease of Use: For investors who like the idea of covered calls but don’t want to manage options directly, QYLD offers a turnkey solution.

Volatility comparison: QYLD has a lower volatility than the NASDAQ 100 (source of graphic: portfoliolabs.com)

In bear markets, QYLD protects investors and in normal circumstances will offer a better performance than the NASDAQ 100. The graphic depicts growth of 10K invested in the past 6 Months

The charts highlight that QYLD generally exhibits lower volatility than the Nasdaq-100. By writing covered calls, the fund collects option premiums that help smooth out price swings. This makes QYLD less sensitive to sudden surges and corrections, offering investors a steadier ride compared to a pure growth index ETF.

Over shorter horizons, this strategy shows its strengths in choppy or declining markets. The second chart illustrates how, during downturns, QYLD has been able to limit losses more effectively than the Nasdaq-100. The income from option premiums acts as a cushion, allowing the ETF to protect capital while still delivering monthly cash flow.

That said, the trade-off is visible during rising markets, where QYLD underperforms because its upside is capped. Investors benefit from more stability and reliable distributions, but they won’t fully capture the rallies of tech-heavy indices. In essence, QYLD prioritizes income and smoother performance over aggressive capital appreciation.

Negatives

Limited Growth Potential
Since QYLD writes at-the-money calls, it essentially sells away most of the upside from Nasdaq-100 rallies. When tech stocks soar, QYLD captures very little of that growth.

NAV Decay Over Time
The fund’s net asset value (NAV) tends to drift lower over the long term because option income often comes at the cost of capital appreciation. In other words, you get high income but sacrifice long-term wealth growth.

High Fees
QYLD charges an expense ratio of 0.60%, which is steep compared to plain index ETFs like QQQ (0.20%) or VOO (0.03%).

Dividend Sustainability Concerns
Distributions are largely driven by option premiums, which depend on market volatility. In calm markets, premiums are smaller, and dividends can shrink. Some payouts may also come from return of capital, which isn’t true “income.”

Concentration Risk
Like QQQ, QYLD is dominated by large tech companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Amazon. While diversified within tech, it doesn’t provide broad sector exposure.

Performance QYLD

ETF	Div Yld
QYLD	13.67%	–
QQQ	0.71%

Source: Yahoo finance – QYLD ETF

Over the past year, QYLD has delivered a total return of around 5.6%, reflecting modest gains supported primarily by its steady monthly income distributions. While its yield remains attractive, annual results can vary depending on market conditions and the premiums collected from selling options.

Looking at the medium term, performance has been uneven. The 3-year annualized return sits at 12.0%, boosted by periods of strong volatility, whereas the 5-year figure drops to 6.8%, showing how sensitive the strategy is to market cycles. QYLD tends to perform better in environments with heightened uncertainty where option premiums are larger.

Over longer horizons, QYLD has shown stable but moderate growth, with 8.6% annualized over 10 years and 7.7% since inception. This track record confirms its role as an income-driven product: consistent monthly cash flow with steady long-term returns, though without the explosive growth of pure equity strategies.

Is QYLD Sustainable? What is the risk of QYLD?

QYLD’s dividends come mainly from option premiums, which means payouts can vary with market volatility — often rising when uncertainty is higher. While this makes the income stream less predictable than traditional dividends, it also allows QYLD to maintain an attractive yield and steady monthly cash flow for income-focused investors. Over time, investors should expect less capital appreciation, since upside growth is traded for income, but for those prioritizing regular distributions and portfolio stability, QYLD can still be a reliable income-generating tool.

Is QYLD a monthly dividend

Yes, QYLD offers a monthly dividend distribution.

QYLD ETF Holdings

Practice example: covered call strategy

To better understand how QYLD’s strategy works, let’s look at a simple example. An investor owns 100 shares of Company A, priced at $30 each. Expecting the stock to stagnate or dip slightly, the investor sells a call option with:

Strike price: $26
Premium: $4
Maturity: April
Quantity: 100 shares

The investor collects $400 in option premiums (4 × 100). Two scenarios can occur:

Scenario	Stock Price Outcome	Action	Result
Case 1	Price rises above $30 (breakeven)	Buyer exercises the option → Seller must sell at $26	• Shares sold below market value • $400 premium collected offsets loss • Effective sale price = $30
Case 2	Price falls below $30 (breakeven)	Buyer does not exercise	• Seller keeps 100 shares • $400 premium collected as extra income • Generates additional return despite price drop

Video

Since its launch in 2021, HDIV has become one of Canada’s most talked-about income ETFs. Its promise: deliver stable monthly income with lower volatility than the Canadian market, while giving investors access to multiple key sectors through an actively managed, covered call strategy.

With a distribution yield of around 12%, HDIV is built for investors seeking consistent cash flow rather than maximum capital appreciation. This makes it especially appealing for retirees, income-oriented investors, and anyone looking to balance returns with risk management.

Recent Performance

Since inception, HDIV has outperformed the S&P/TSX 60 Index. For example, between July 2021 and July 2025, a $10,000 investment in HDIV grew to $17,300, compared to $15,500 for the S&P/TSX 60.

This outperformance is largely explained by the ETF’s ability to consistently add option premiums to the dividends already paid by the underlying securities. While HDIV does cap upside during strong bull markets (a natural tradeoff with covered call strategies), it has shown resilience in volatile periods, providing investors with steady income even in challenging environments.

Structure and Strategy

HDIV is a fund of funds: it doesn’t buy stocks directly but invests in a suite of Hamilton ETFs, each of which applies a covered call strategy.

Covered calls generate option premiums on top of dividends, significantly boosting income.

Sector diversification spans Canadian banks, energy, utilities, gold, technology, and healthcare — giving broader exposure than the traditional Canadian market, which is heavily concentrated in financials and energy.

Leverage (25%) is used to enhance yields. The fund’s leverage is capped at 125% of NAV, keeping it within a moderate range.

Monthly distributions are a core feature, providing reliable cash flow.

Sector Allocation (July 2025)

Financials: 36%

Technology: 17%

Energy: 13%

Gold: 12%

Utilities: 14%

Healthcare & others: ~8%

This allocation blends defensive sectors (banks, utilities, gold) with growth engines (technology, healthcare), creating a balanced income-oriented portfolio.

Fees (MER)

As of July 2025, HDIV’s Management Expense Ratio (MER) is 2.55%.

It’s important to note that the fund itself charges no direct management fee. The MER reflects operating expenses + the fees of the underlying Hamilton ETFs.

While this is high compared to traditional index ETFs, it is in line with other derivative-based income strategies and justified by the complexity of managing covered call positions and sector exposure.

✅ Advantages of HDIV

High and stable monthly income: with a 12% yield, it meets the needs of retirees and cash flow-focused investors.

Broader diversification: exposure to sectors like technology and healthcare helps reduce Canada’s natural concentration in banks and energy.

Lower volatility: option premiums cushion downturns, reducing overall volatility compared to the market.

Moderate leverage: enhances yield while remaining controlled.

Reliable cash flow: monthly payouts align with investors’ income needs.

Turnkey solution: instead of managing multiple sector-specific covered call ETFs, investors can access them all through HDIV.

⚠️ Risks and Limitations

Capped upside: in strong bull markets, HDIV will underperform broad indices due to options limiting gains.

Leverage risk: while moderate, the 25% leverage amplifies both gains and losses.

Sector concentration: despite diversification, exposure to banks and energy remains significant.

High fees (2.55% MER): part of the income goes to covering costs.

Market risk: covered calls cushion declines but don’t eliminate losses in prolonged downturns.

Interest rate sensitivity: like many income products, HDIV may face pressure when rates rise.

Reinvesting vs. Taking Distributions (DRIP or Cash)

Income-oriented investors (e.g., retirees) may prefer taking cash distributions to fund expenses.

Growth-focused investors may choose to reinvest via a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), compounding returns over time.

The choice depends on your goals: immediate income or long-term wealth building.

🎯 Conclusion

HDIV is a unique Canadian ETF that combines high income, sector diversification, and covered call strategies into a single product. It is best suited for conservative and income-focused investors who value stability and cash flow over growth.

That said, investors must be aware of its tradeoffs: capped upside in bull markets, higher fees, and modest leverage risks.

👉 In short: HDIV is an excellent passive income tool, ideal for generating monthly cash flow and stabilizing a portfolio, but less suitable for maximizing long-term capital growth.